Solana’s Failed SIMD-0228 Vote Still Haunts the Network as Inflation Debate Returns

The debate over Solana inflation returned to the spotlight after Helius CEO Mert Mumtaz publicly criticized validators who voted against SIMD-0228, the proposal to reduce $SOL issuance. In a post on X, Mumtaz wrote: “Good morning to everyone who voted against reducing Solana issuance to collect rent.”

The comment revived one of the most divisive governance discussions in Solana’s history and immediately drew attention back to the network’s ongoing disagreement over validator incentives, staking yields, and token inflation.

SIMD-0228 became one of the most closely watched governance proposals in crypto after it attempted to replace Solana’s fixed disinflation schedule with a more dynamic, market-driven emission model.

Supporters argued that reducing inflation would strengthen $SOL’s long-term tokenomics, lower sell pressure, and encourage more productive use of capital across DeFi applications. Critics warned that lower emissions could damage validator economics, weaken decentralization, and reduce the attractiveness of $SOL as a yield-bearing asset.

SIMD-0228 Failed Despite Majority Support

When voting on SIMD-0228 began in March 2025, the proposal appeared headed for a comfortable victory. Early votes favored the proposal by a roughly 3-to-1 margin. However, smaller validators mobilized aggressively during the final stages of voting. Despite most votes supporting the proposal, SIMD-0228 failed to meet the required 66.67% approval threshold.

The vote produced record participation across the network. More than 74% of Solana’s network stake participated across 910 validators, making it one of the largest governance events in crypto history.

Onchain data highlighted a sharp divide between validator groups. Operators with less than 500,000 $SOL in delegated stake were twice as likely to oppose the proposal compared to validators controlling more than 500,000 $SOL. Even after the proposal failed, many ecosystem leaders still described the process as a success for Solana governance.

Lily Liu Warned the Proposal Was “Too Half-Baked”

Mike Dudas, Founder and Managing Partner at 6th Man Ventures, joined the conversation when he reposted an older thread from Lily Liu, President of the Solana Foundation, and commented, “this didn’t age well”.

In March 2025, Liu strongly opposed SIMD-0228 and described the proposal as “too, too half-baked.” Liu argued that many supporters focused too heavily on network engineering while overlooking the broader implications for $SOL as a financial asset. According to Liu, predictable yields played a critical role in attracting institutional interest and supporting demand for $SOL investment products.

She argued that fixed yields reduce volatility and help position $SOL as both a growth asset and an income-generating asset. Liu warned that reducing inflation too aggressively could weaken buy-and-hold demand for $SOL and damage one of the ecosystem’s strongest advantages. She also argued that staking rewards served as an ecosystem growth budget, helping fuel innovation.

Beyond economics, Liu criticized what she viewed as fragmented governance planning. She argued that SIMD-0228 failed to properly account for downstream effects on validator economics and related proposals involving vote fees and validator sustainability. “We should grasp every advantage we may have to extend our lead,” Liu wrote at the time.

Anatoly Yakovenko and Mike Dudas Debate Inflation Impact

The revived discussion also prompted comments from Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko. Responding to Dudas, Yakovenko questioned whether additional inflation reductions would make a meaningful difference given Solana’s already declining inflation rate.

“Current inflation rate is 3.85%, do you think changing the rate makes more than a marginal difference at this point?” Yakovenko asked.

Dudas replied that he still believed inflation adjustments mattered but acknowledged that the Solana ecosystem remained deeply divided on the issue.

He added that the disagreement may make it difficult to pass another major inflation reduction proposal. Yakovenko then encouraged further experimentation with governance proposals, replying simply: “Write the simd!”

SIMD-0411 Emerges as a Simpler Alternative

The renewed debate arrives as the Solana ecosystem considers SIMD-0411, a newer proposal designed to reduce $SOL inflation through a more straightforward mechanism. Officially introduced in November 2025 by Helius contributor lostintime and Blueshift’s Dean Little, SIMD-0411 proposes doubling Solana’s annual disinflation rate from 15% to 30%.

If approved, the proposal would accelerate Solana’s path toward its terminal inflation rate of 1.5%, moving the timeline forward from approximately 2032 to early 2029. Over six years, the proposal could reduce $SOL emissions by an estimated 22.3 million $SOL, worth roughly $2.9 billion at the time of the proposal.

Unlike SIMD-0228, SIMD-0411 does not introduce a dynamic emission model. Supporters describe the proposal as a cleaner, easier-to-understand alternative that minimizes implementation risks and avoids unnecessary complexity.

Dr. Nick Almond, Head of Governance at Jito Foundation, referenced the proposal while discussing Mumtaz’s recent comments. He argued that Solana remains in a relatively strong position compared to networks facing larger insider token overhangs.

Despite broader support for SIMD-0411, concerns around validator profitability continue to shape the discussion. According to earlier projections, a number of validators could become unprofitable over the next six years if emissions decline more rapidly.

Research from Galaxy Digital noted that validator income is increasingly coming from transaction fees, priority fees, and MEV activity rather than solely from token emissions.

Supporters of inflation reduction argue that the network must eventually transition toward more sustainable economics driven by actual demand for block space and applications. Opponents of the proposal maintain that high and predictable staking yields still play a crucial role in attracting investors, institutions, and validator participation.

Read More on SolanaFloor

Solana Prop AMM Volume Share Drops Below 50% for First Time Since November 2025
Solana’s $USDe Supply Rises By $564M in 1 Week as Lending Markets Ignite Demand

How Will Solana React To The Rising Demand For Privacy?